Anti-smacking referendum blocked by PM

The New Zealand government has blocked a 390,000-signature petition by Kiwi Party leader Larry Baldock to have a referendum with a view to revising the anti-smacking bill introduced last year.

Kiwi Party leader Larry Baldock
Prime Minister Helen Clark said such a referendum could not be held before the upcoming elections for logistical reasons. But National leader John Key says Clark is “arrogant” for delaying and saying it was too late.

The petition was presented to parliament house in Wellington this week.

Key has argued that Clark is trying to use a technicality to circumvent peoples' rights. Clark is legally obliged to put off a referendum if it is seen to sway voters on Election Day.

However, Family First NZ have said in a statement that election day was the best time to hold a referendum as holding it separately would be a waste of tax-payer money.

The legislation was introduced by Green MP Sue Bradford and amended section 59 of the Crimes Act to remove the defence of reasonable force for parents who physically discipline their children.

Bradford said the legislation was working well and should not be changed back.

"Over the past couple of years more and more New Zealanders are turning away from using violence in bringing up their children," she told media.

A second review by the police has shown a decrease in the number of smacking events from when the amendment was first introduced. The amendment gave police discretion to judge whether a reported offence warranted prosecution.

The law will have another review in June next year, two years after its introduction.


Is it a parent’s right to smack their child?

Agree or disagree? Share your thoughts.

NB: Email addresses are required to register but are not published on this site and will remain confidential

Post Comment

Posted Comments

Reformed naughty child 10-07-2008 16:07:07
Keeping it Real - you need to check your facts. How can the last decade of increased crime coincide with the anti-smacking bill which just started last year?? You also said: "those parents that do cross the line deservedly get punished." No, they don't. Many get away because of the loophole in the law. Parents don't have the right to smack their child, they have the right and reponsibility to discipline their child. This may come as a shock, but for difficult kids the most effective form of discipline is in isolating them, and doing this consistently. What we need is information that discipline does not mean smacking - people need to be taught that there are alternative, more effective forms of discipline.

Keeping it Real 03-07-2008 10:24:13
I have to disagree. Our children are getting worse and that is because of the breakdown of family values and the family unit where respect and discipline used to keep our young ones on the straight and narrow. It may seem outdated and out of touch but the truth is, the world is tougher to exist in without boundaries and our children need to know where crossing the line is. I do not condone violence against children and those parents that do cross the line deservedly get punished. But no law should take the right of a parent to discipline his child. If it aint broke, don't fix it. It is parents who lack those skills to raise their children properly who are making the other parents with good intentions look like criminals. We need to review this law. it is simple maths, the last decade has seen youth delinquency and crime rise and that coincides with the reduction of the drinking age, the anti-smacking law and the influx of overseas materialism, particularly from the USA. We live in a different world now so we must get tougher.

Tyronne 01-07-2008 10:18:00
Why is Baldcock bringing this up? The law and the ad campaign has done a lot to make us think there are other ways of enforcing discipline than violence. Give it a rest.

1 |

Search Site


Subscribe NOW!